Lensectomy as treatment for refractory or progressive retinopathy of prematurity narrow-angle glaucoma.

We present the case of a patient with a history of laser-treated retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) who developed narrow angles and intermittent angle closure. Despite laser peripheral iridotomy/iridoplasty, 1 year later, the patient had recurrent narrowing that resolved following clear lens extraction with intraocular lens placement. This case highlights the importance of continued monitoring for narrow angles in patients with ROP history.

Long-Term Efficacy of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Primary Angle-Closure Disease After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in eyes with primary angle-closure (PAC) and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) following a laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). METHOD: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 45 eyes of 34 patients with PAC/PACG diagnosis, uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP), and visible pigmented trabecular-meshwork (TM) at least 180° on gonioscopy following a LPI were recruited. Following a detailed baseline ophthalmic evaluation, all eligible eyes underwent SLT, and the patients were examined on day1, at 1 week, 1-, 3-, and 6-months, and 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year subsequently. The main outcomes measured were IOP, number of IOP-lowering agents, and complications. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 57.80 ± 6.44 years, the male-female ratio was 8:26, and 17 eyes were PACG, and 28 were PAC. The baseline IOP was 23.81 ± 1.78 mm Hg, and was significantly declined at all follow-ups (p < .0001). The cumulative probability of overall success was 91% and 84% at 2-, and 5-year, respectively. At 5-year SLT provided drug-freedom in 80% of PAC and 23% of PACG eyes. Six eyes had IOP spike at 1-week and two patients underwent repeat SLT after 1-year. No other complications, such as pain/discomfort, inflammation, an increase in peripheral anterior synechiae and cystoid-macular-edema, were noted. CONCLUSIONS: SLT appears a safe and cost-effective procedure in PAC/mild- moderate PACG eyes with uncontrolled IOP after laser iridotomy. The long-term effectiveness of SLT as adjuvant treatment was good, but need large sized randomized studies for more validation.

Long-Term Risk and Prediction of Progression in Primary Angle Closure Suspect.

Importance: Identifying primary angle closure suspect (PACS) eyes at risk of angle closure is crucial for its management. However, the risk of progression and its prediction are still understudied in long-term longitudinal studies about PACS. Objective: To explore baseline predictors and develop prediction models for the 14-year risk of progression from PACS to primary angle closure (PAC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study involved participants from the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention trial who had untreated eyes with PACS. Baseline examinations included tonometry, ultrasound A-scan biometry, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) under both light and dark conditions. Primary angle closure was defined as peripheral anterior synechiae in 1 or more clock hours, intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 24 mm Hg, or acute angle closure. Based on baseline covariates, logistic regression models were built to predict the risk of progression from PACS to PAC during 14 years of follow-up. Results: The analysis included 377 eyes from 377 patients (mean [SD] patient age at baseline, 58.28 [4.71] years; 317 females [84%]). By the 14-year follow-up visit, 93 eyes (25%) had progressed from PACS to PAC. In multivariable models, higher IOP (odds ratio [OR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.04-1.25] per 1-mm Hg increase), shallower central anterior chamber depth (ACD; OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67-0.97] per 0.1-mm increase), and shallower limbal ACD (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99] per 0.01 increase in peripheral corneal thickness) at baseline were associated with an increased 14-year risk of progression from PACS to PAC. As for AS-OCT measurements, smaller light-room trabecular-iris space area (TISA) at 500 µm from the scleral spur (OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.77-0.96] per 0.01-mm2 increase), smaller light-room angle recess area (ARA) at 750 µm from the scleral spur (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.98] per 0.01-mm2 increase), and smaller dark-room TISA at 500 µm (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-0.98] per 0.01-mm2 increase) at baseline were identified as predictors for the 14-year risk of progression. The prediction models based on IOP and central and limbal ACDs showed moderate performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63-0.75) in predicting progression from PACS to PAC, and inclusion of AS-OCT metrics did not improve the model's performance. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study suggests that higher IOP, shallower central and limbal ACDs, and smaller TISA at 500 µm and light-room ARA at 750 µm may serve as baseline predictors for progression to PAC in PACS eyes. Evaluating these factors can aid in customizing PACS management.

Practice Patterns and Sociodemographic Disparities in the Clinical Care of Anatomical Narrow Angles in the United States.

PURPOSE: To assess treatment and visit patterns among patients with newly diagnosed anatomical narrow angle (ANA) and identify sociodemographic factors associated with disparities in care. DESIGN: Retrospective practice pattern evaluation study. METHODS: A total of 263,422 patients diagnosed with ANA between 2007 and 2019 were identified in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart. Inclusion was limited to newly diagnosed ANA, defined as (1) continuous enrollment during a 2-year lookback period and 1-year study period from first diagnosis; (2) diagnosis by an ophthalmologist or optometrist; and (3) no history of pseudophakia, ANA treatments, or prior primary angle closure glaucoma diagnosis. Outcome measures were treatment with laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI), cataract surgery, or intraocular pressure-lowering medications and number of eye care visits. Logistic and Poisson regression were performed to assess factors associated with treatment and eye care visits, respectively. RESULTS: Among 52,405 eligible cases, 27.7% received LPI, 13.9% received drops, and 15.1% received cataract surgery. Odds of LPI were higher in Asians and Hispanics (odds ratio [OR] ≥ 1.16, P < .001). Non-Whites had higher odds of drops (OR ≥ 1.19, P < .001), but Hispanics had lower odds of cataract surgery (OR = 0.79, P < .001). The mean number of eye care visits was 2.6±2.1 including the day of diagnosis. Older age and treatment were associated with higher rates of eye care visits (rate ratio > 1.15, P < .001). CONCLUSION: More than a quarter of patients with newly diagnosed ANA receive treatment with LPI. Racial minorities are more likely to receive ANA-specific treatments but less likely to receive cataract surgery. These differences may reflect racial differences in disease severity and the need for clearer practice guidelines in ANA care.

Retrospective Study of Preoperative Laser Peripheral Iridotomy Versus Intraoperative Surgical Peripheral Iridectomy in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) and surgical peripheral iridectomy (SPI) for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and DMEK with cataract extraction (triple DMEK). METHODS: This retrospective interventional study included 135 eyes of 135 patients who underwent DMEK alone or triple DMEK. Primary outcomes were graft detachments necessitating rebubbling, repeat grafts, and pupillary block. The secondary outcomes included rejection, cystoid macular edema, uveitis, intraoperative hyphema, visual disturbances, and surgical time. RESULTS: Thirty-one eyes in the LPI group and 104 eyes in the SPI group were included. Fifty-six eyes had DMEK alone, and 79 had triple DMEK. Visually significant graft detachments occurred in 7 of 31 eyes in the LPI group versus 19 of 104 eyes in the SPI group ( P = 0.61). No statistical significance in DMEK alone versus triple DMEK groups ( P = 0.61 vs. P > 0.99). Two patients in the LPI group and 5 in the SPI group required regraft ( P = 0.66). One (3.2%) experienced pupillary block compared with 5 (4.8%) ( P = 0.99) in the LPI and SPI groups, respectively. Secondary outcomes were similar in both groups ranging from 0% to 3% ( P > 0.99). None had visual disturbances. In DMEK alone, duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the LPI versus SPI group (32.8 vs. 44.1 minutes, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated similar outcomes between LPI and SPI, although the LPI group had a shorter duration of surgery when DMEK was performed alone. The remainder of the outcomes demonstrated no statistically significant differences.

Progressive Changes in the Anterior Segment and Their Impact on the Anterior Chamber Angle in Primary Angle Closure Disease.

PURPOSE: To investigate longitudinal changes in the anterior segment (AS) using serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and determine the impact of these changes on the anterior chamber angle (ACA) in eyes with primary angle closure disease (PACD) treated with laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. METHODS: This study included 103 patients with PACD who underwent LPI and were followed up by a mean 6.7 ± 1.7 AS-OCT examinations for a mean 6.5 ± 2.9 years. Temporal changes in AS-OCT parameters, including anterior chamber depth (ACD), angle opening distance (AOD750), angle recess area (ARA750), iris thickness (IT750), lens vault (LV), and pupil diameter (PD), were analyzed by multivariate linear mixed effects models (LMEMs). RESULTS: Multivariate LMEMs showed that decrease in AOD750 was not significant (-1.59 µm/y, P = .222); however, ARA750 decreased over time (-2.3 × 103 µm2/y, P = .033) and SSA showed marginal significance (-0.20°/y, P = .098), and LV increased significantly (11.6 µm/y, P < .001) after LPI. Mean LV change was negatively associated with AOD750, ARA750, and SSA, whereas PD was negatively associated with ARA750 (P < .001 each). PD decreased with aging (-13.7 µm/y, P = .036), accompanied by thinning of IT750 (-1.7 µm/y, P = .063). CONCLUSIONS: LV tends to increase with aging, which contributes to the shallowing of the anterior chamber and narrowing of ACA in PACD eyes treated with LPI. In the meantime, pupillary constriction and subsequent peripheral iris thinning associated with aging could possibly offset the effect of ACA narrowing.

Bilateral angle closure glaucoma with retinitis pigmentosa in young patients: case series.

BACKGROUND: To report the ocular characteristics and management of three cases of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) concurrent primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG). CASE PRESENTATION: Three middle-aged patients presenting with diminished vision, high intraocular pressure (IOP), and typical fundus manifestations of RP were clinically evaluated. The individualized treatment was based on the ocular conditions of each case. A novel genetic alteration in ZNF408 was identified in one patient. Two patients with short-axial eyes received unilateral combined trabeculectomy, cataract surgery, and Irido-zonulo-hyaloid-vitrectomy. One of them had a subluxated lens, managed with a capsular tension ring implantation. Their contralateral eyes, respectively, underwent laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) and transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. The third patient underwent bilaterally combined laser peripheral iridoplasty, LPI, and medication. Ultimately, all patients achieved the target IOP during a two-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Young patients with RP may have a risk of developing angle closure glaucoma, and conversely, patients with angle closure glaucoma at younger age should be aware of the presence of RP. Therefore, routine gonioscopy and IOP monitoring are required for RP patients, and detailed fundus examinations are warranted for young PACG patients.

Twenty-Four-Hour Intraocular Pressure in Chronic Primary Angle-Closure Disease.

PRCIS: Primary angle closure and primary angle closure glaucoma may exhibit normal intraocular pressure. Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation is highest in primary angle closure glaucoma. The degree of peripheral anterior synechiae was associated with a 24-hour intraocular pressure pattern in primary angle-closure disease without laser iridotomy. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to study 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) patterns in eyes with chronic primary angle-closure disease and evaluate associations between peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) and 24-hour IOP pattern. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 59 eyes of 35 Asian patients with chronic primary angle-closure disease underwent complete ocular examinations at Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University. Twenty-four-hour IOP records were obtained using Goldmann applanation tonometry at 2-hour intervals. Peak, mean, and trough 24-hour IOP values and 24-hour IOP fluctuation (difference between peak and trough values) were compared among groups. None of the participants received any treatment before complete data collection. RESULTS: Even univariable analysis demonstrated a significant difference in peak, mean, and trough IOP and 24-hour IOP fluctuation between the 3 groups; the magnitude of trough IOP was not higher than 21 mmHg in all groups. In multivariable analysis, PAC and PACG eyes showed significantly higher peak IOP ( P =0.020 and 0.006, respectively) and 24-hour IOP fluctuation ( P =0.048 and 0.001, respectively) compared with PACS eyes. In comparison between combined PACS and PAC eyes versus PACG eyes, PACG eyes revealed significantly higher 24-hour IOP fluctuation. The degree of PAS was associated with peak and mean IOP values and with 24-hour IOP fluctuation in PAC and PACG eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-four-hour IOP fluctuation was highest in PACG eyes. Although PAC and PACG eyes showed higher peak IOP and 24-hour IOP fluctuation values, compared with PACS eyes, trough IOP in PAC and PACG eyes were mostly below 21 mmHg. In addition, the degree of PAS was associated with a 24-hour IOP pattern in either PAC or PACG eyes.

Short-term changes detected by corneal topography and optical coherence tomography after prophylactic laser iridotomy in primary angle closure suspect.

PURPOSE: To evaluate early changes in anterior segment parameters by Scheimpflug-Placido disc topography system and changes in retinal layers by optical coherence tomography in primary angle-closure suspects after laser peripheral iridotomy. METHODS: One eye of 26 patients with primary angle closure suspect and of 20 healthy subjects were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Anterior chamber depth/volume, iridocorneal angle and central corneal thickness were obtained by Scheimpflug-Placido disc topography system. Retinal thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness were acquired by optical coherence tomography. All the tests were repeated 1 week and 1 month after laser peripheral iridotomy. RESULTS: The mean ages of the patients and healthy controls were 64.8 ± 10.7 years and 64.5 ± 3.9 years, respectively (p = 0.990). Anterior chamber depth/volume and iridocorneal angle value were lower in the PACS group (p < 0.001, for all). Anterior chamber volume and iridocorneal angle increased significantly after laser peripheral iridotomy (p = 0.004, for both). While foveal thickness decreased significantly after laser peripheral iridotomy (p = 0.027), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness increased in superior and temporal quadrants (p = 0.038 and p = 0.016, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that LPI in patients with PACS provides improved retinal thickness and RNFL thickness, as well as anterior chamber parameters.

Changes in Anterior Segment Parameters After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Caucasian Eyes With Different Primary Angle Closure Mechanisms.

PRCIS: Subgrouping of angle closure mechanisms based on the swept-source optical coherence tomography images may help to identify the predominant underlying anatomic mechanism, evaluate personal treatment, and improve the better outcomes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in anterior segment parameters in Caucasian eyes with different angle closure mechanisms before and after laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). METHODS: Sixty-six subjects underwent swept-source optical coherence tomography (CASIA, Tomey Corporation) angle imaging in the dark before and 7 days after LPI. On the basis of the baseline swept-source optical coherence tomography images, the eyes were categorized into 4 angle closure mechanisms, namely pupillary block (PB), plateau iris configuration (PIC), thick peripheral iris (TPI), and large lens vault (LLV). Sixteen out of 128 cross-sectional images (11.25 degrees apart) per volume scan were selected for analysis. We used a generalized estimating equation to compare quantitative parameters among angle closure mechanisms and between before and after LPI after adjusting the intereye correlation. RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 67.7±9.2 years, with the majority being female (82.2%). One hundred twenty-nine eyes (67 primary angle closure suspects, 34 primary angle closure, and 28 primary angle closure glaucoma) were categorized into PB (n=71, 55%), PIC (n=40, 31%), TPI (n=14, 10.9%), and LLV (n=4, 3.1%). Anterior chamber depth was the shallowest in the LLV, followed by TPI, PB, and PIC group at baseline. Widening of the angle and reduction of the iris curvature (IC) due to LPI were observed in all groups (all P <0.01). When compared to the PB group, the LPI-induced angle widening in the TPI group was significantly less even though the iris curvature reduction in the TPI group was greater (all P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with angle closure, anterior segment morphology and LPI-induced angle widening were different among the various angle closure mechanisms.

[Predictors of the success of laser peripheral iridotomy and lensectomy in the early stages of primary angle closure disease]. / Prediktory uspekha perifericheskoi lazernoi iridotomii i lensektomii pri nachal'nykh stadiyakh zabolevaniya pervichnogo zakrytiya ugla perednei kamery.

The article reviews literature data on the search for predictors of the success of laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) and lensectomy in the early stages of primary angle closure disease (PACD) and presents a trend analysis of the studies conducted on individuals identified as primary angle closure suspects (PACs) and those with primary angle closure (PAC). The concept of the review was determined by the ambiguous choice of treatment for patients at the stage of PAC onset. Determining the success predictors of LPI or lensectomy plays a key role in optimizing the treatment of PACD. The results of literature analysis are contradictory, which indicates the need for further research taking into account modern methods of visualization of the eye structures such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), Swept Source OCT (SS-OCT), and the use of uniform criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of treatment.

Chronic Antioxidant Capacity Loss in Anterior Chamber Environment After Iridectomy.

Purpose: To compare the ascorbic acid concentration and total antioxidant capacity in the aqueous humor of pigmented Rex rabbits after sham operation (control), iridectomy, and trabeculectomy. Methods: Pigmented Rex rabbits were divided into control, iridectomy, and trabeculectomy groups and followed up for 12 months after surgery. Ascorbic acid concentration and total antioxidant capacity in the aqueous humor, intraocular pressure, and the occurrence of cataracts were examined in each group. Results: The ascorbic acid concentration and total antioxidant capacity after iridectomy and trabeculectomy were significantly lower at one week and at one, six, and 12 months after operation than those in the control group (P ≤ 0.03). Ascorbic acid concentration was positively and significantly correlated with total antioxidant capacity in the aqueous humor (P < 0.01). Compared to the control and the iridectomy groups, intraocular pressure in the trabeculectomy group was significantly lower at one week and at one and six months after surgery (one week: P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively; one month: P < 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively; six months: P = 0.03). Histological findings in the iridectomy and trabeculectomy groups included the appearance of vacuoles in the lens at six and 12 months after surgery. Conclusions: Iridectomy causes a sustained decrease in ascorbic acid concentration, followed by a long-term decrease in the total antioxidant capacity within the aqueous humor. Translational Relevance: The animal model possibly predicts the vulnerability focusing on the antioxidant level in the anterior chamber environment after trabeculectomy and iridectomy per se in clinical settings.

Cost-effectiveness of Prophylactic Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle-Closure Suspects.

PURPOSE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) in primary angle-closure (PAC) suspects (PACSs). DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis utilizing Markov models. SUBJECTS: Patients with narrow angles (PACSs). METHODS: Progression from PACSs through 4 states (PAC, PAC glaucoma, blindness, and death) was simulated using Markov cycles. The cohort entered at 50 years and received either LPI or no treatment. Transition probabilities were calculated from published models, and risk reduction of LPI was calculated from the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention trial. We estimated costs of Medicare rates, and previously published utility values were used to calculate quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Incremental CE ratios (ICER) were evaluated at $50 000. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) addressed uncertainty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total cost, QALY, and ICER. RESULTS: Over 2 years, the ICER for the LPI cohort was > $50 000. At 6 years, the LPI cohort was less expensive with more accrued QALY. In PSA, the LPI arm was cost-effective in 24.65% of iterations over 2 years and 92.69% over 6 years. The most sensitive parameters were probability of progressing to PAC and cost and number of annual office visits. CONCLUSIONS: By 6 years, prophylactic LPI was cost-effective. The rate of progressing to PAC and differing practice patterns most impacted CE. With uncertainty of management of narrow angles, cost may be a decision management tool for providers. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Efficacy and safety of laser peripheral iridoplasty with different energy levels and locations in the treatment of primary angle closure disease assessed by swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND: To explore the efficacy and safety of laser peripheral iridoplasty (LPIp) with different energy levels and locations in the treatment of primary angle closure disease (PACD) assessed by swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). METHODS: We enrolled patients with PACD following best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), anterior chamber gonioscopy, ultrasound biomicroscopy(UBM), optic disc OCT, and visual field examinations. After Pentacam and AS-OCT measurements, the patients were randomly divided into four treatment groups for LPIp with two different energy levels (high vs. low energy) and two locations (far from the periphery vs. near the periphery) and combined with laser peripheral iridotomy. BCVA, IOP, pupil diameter, central anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume, anterior opening distance (AOD)500, AOD750, trabecular iris angle (TIA)500, and TIA750 in four quadrants before and after laser treatment were compared. RESULTS: We followed up 32 patients (64 eyes; average age, 61.80 ± 9.79 years; 8 patients/16 eyes per group) for up to 2 years. The IOP of all enrolled patients was decreased after surgery compared to that before (t = 3.297, P = 0.002), the volume of the anterior chamber was increased (t=-2.047, P = 0.047), and AOD500, AOD750, TIA500, and TIA750 were increased (all P < 0.05). Within-group comparisons showed that BCVA in the low-energy/far-periphery group was improved after surgery (P < 0.05). After surgery, the IOP was decreased in the two high-energy groups, whereas the volume of the anterior chamber, AOD500, AOD750, TIA500, and TIA750 were increased in all groups (all P < 0.05). However, when comparing every two groups, the high-energy/far-periphery group showed a stronger effect on pupil dilation than the low-energy/near-periphery group (P = 0.045). The anterior chamber volume in the high-energy/near-periphery group was larger than that in the high-energy/far-periphery group (P = 0.038). The change in TIA500 was for 6 points smaller in the low-energy/near-periphery group than in the low-energy/far-periphery group (P = 0.038). Other parameters showed no significant group differences. CONCLUSION: LPIp combined with iridotomy can effectively reduce IOP, increase anterior chamber volume, increase chamber angle opening distance, and widen the trabecular iris angle. Intraoperatively, high-energy laser spots positioned one spot diameter from the scleral spur can obtain the best effect and safety. Swept-source AS-OCT can safely and effectively quantify the anterior chamber angle.

Fourteen-Year Outcome of Angle-Closure Prevention with Laser Iridotomy in the Zhongshan Angle-Closure Prevention Study: Extended Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) prophylaxis for patients with primary angle-closure suspect (PACS) after 14 years and to identify risk factors for the conversion from PACS to primary angle closure (PAC). DESIGN: Extended follow-up of the Zhongshan Angle-Closure Prevention Study. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred eighty-nine Chinese patients 50 to 70 years of age with bilateral PACS. METHODS: Each patient received LPI in 1 randomly selected eye, with the fellow untreated eye serving as a control. Because the risk of glaucoma was low and acute angle closure (AAC) occurred only rarely, the follow-up was extended to 14 years despite substantial benefits of LPI reported after the 6-year visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of PAC, a composite end point including peripheral anterior synechiae, intraocular pressure (IOP) of > 24 mmHg, or AAC. RESULTS: During the 14 years, 390 LPI-treated eyes and 388 control eyes were lost to follow-up. A total of 33 LPI-treated eyes and 105 control eyes reached primary end points (P < 0.01). Within them, 1 LPI-treated eye and 5 control eyes progressed to AAC. Primary angle-closure glaucoma was found in 2 LPI-treated eyes and 4 control eyes. The hazard ratio for progression to PAC was 0.31 (95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.46) in LPI-treated eyes compared with control eyes. At the 14-year visit, LPI-treated eyes showed more severe nuclear cataract, higher IOP, and larger angle width and limbal anterior chamber depth (LACD) than control eyes. Higher IOP, shallower LACD, and greater central anterior chamber depth (CACD) were associated with an increased risk of end points developing in control eyes. In the treated group, eyes with higher IOP, shallower LACD, or less IOP elevation after the darkroom prone provocative test (DRPPT) were more likely to demonstrate PAC after LPI. CONCLUIONS: Despite a two-third decrease in PAC occurrence after LPI, the cumulative risk of progression was relatively low in the community-based PACS population over 14 years. Apart from IOP, IOP elevation after DRPPT, CACD, and LACD, more risk factors are needed to achieve precise prediction of PAC occurrence and to guide clinical practice. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Biometric Risk Factors for Angle Closure Progression After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy.

Importance: Laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) is the most common primary treatment for primary angle closure disease (PACD). However, there are sparse data guiding the longitudinal care of PAC suspect (PACS) eyes after LPI. Objective: To elucidate the anatomic effects of LPI that are associated with a protective outcome against progression from PACS to PAC and acute angle closure (AAC) and to identify biometric factors that predict progression after LPI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective analysis of data from the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention (ZAP) trial, a study of mainland Chinese people aged 50 to 70 years with bilateral PACS who received LPI in 1 randomly selected eye. Gonioscopy and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) imaging were performed 2 weeks after LPI. Progression was defined as the development of PAC or an acute angle closure (AAC) attack. Cohort A included a random mix of treated and untreated eyes, and cohort B included only eyes treated with LPI. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were developed to assess biometric risk factors for progression in cohorts A and B. Data were analyzed from January 4 to December 22, 2022. Main Outcome and Measure: Six-year progression to PAC or AAC. Results: Cohort A included 878 eyes from 878 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [5.0] years; 726 female [82.7%]) of whom 44 experienced progressive disease. In a multivariable analysis, treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.34-1.33; P = .25) was no longer associated with progression after adjusting for age and trabecular iris space area at 500 µm (TISA at 500 µm) at the 2-week visit. Cohort B included 869 treated eyes from 869 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [5.0] years; 717 female [82.5%]) of whom 19 experienced progressive disease. In multivariable analysis, TISA at 500 µm (HR, 1.33 per 0.01 mm2 smaller; 95% CI, 1.12-1.56; P = .001) and cumulative gonioscopy score (HR, 1.25 per grade smaller; 95% CI, 1.03-1.52; P = .02) at the 2-week visit were associated with progression. Persistent angle narrowing on AS-OCT (TISA at 500 µm ≤0.05 mm2; HR, 9.41; 95% CI, 3.39-26.08; P <.001) or gonioscopy (cumulative score ≤6; HR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.13-6.93; P =.04) conferred higher risk of progression. Conclusions and Relevance: Study results suggest that persistent angle narrowing detected by AS-OCT or cumulative gonioscopy score was predictive of disease progression in PACS eyes after LPI. These findings suggest that AS-OCT and gonioscopy may be performed to identify patients at high risk of developing angle closure who may benefit from closer monitoring despite patent LPI.

Factors defining the intraocular pressure-lowering effect of phacoemulsification and laser peripheral iridotomy in patients with primary angle closure : Factors defining IOP lowering effect of PE and LPI in PAC.

To identify whether gonioscopic ciliary body visibility and factors including anterior chamber depth (ACD), axial length (AL), acute attack history, and preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) had any effect on IOP decrease in primary angle closure (PAC) and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) after phacoemulsification (PE) and/or laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). This retrospective-design study was conducted with 81 eyes with PAC and PACG; 33 eyes whose IOP was controlled with LPI and PE constituted group 1, and 48 eyes whose IOP was controlled using LPI alone comprised group 2. The effects on preoperative and last-visit IOP levels, ciliary body visibility, ACD, AL, and acute attacks were analyzed. Eyes within the groups were similar in AL, ACD, and preoperative IOP except for acute attack history, which was found to be higher in group 1. For group 1, none of the factors was found to have a differentiative effect on IOP decrease after PE, except eyes with preoperative IOP > 21 mm Hg, which had significantly more IOP reduction. For group 2, no difference was found in ciliary body visibility, and higher or lower ACD. However, eyes with AL ≥ 22 mm, positive acute attack history, and higher preoperative IOP were associated with significantly better IOP reduction. We found no relationship between ciliary body visibility and an IOP-reducing effect of PE and LPI. Although we found PE effective in IOP reduction in all eyes, we determined LPI to have a lesser IOP-reducing effect in eyes with IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg and AL < 22 mm.

Comparison of Lens Extraction Versus Laser Iridotomy on Anterior Segment, Choroid, and Intraocular Pressure in Primary Angle Closure Using Machine Learning.

PRCIS: Treatment strategy of primary angle closure (PAC) is not clear due to the large number of clinical and anatomic-topographic parameters in PAC, influencing the treatment algorithm. Using the machine learning method DD-SIMCA, we justify the expediency of early lens extraction (LE) in PAC. PURPOSE: To compare the anatomic and functional efficacy of LE and laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) in patients with PAC using Machine Learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 120 patients aged 41-80 years: 60 eyes with PAC, 30 with PAC suspects, and 30 with healthy eyes (control). Thirty PAC eyes with intraocular pressure (IOP) up to 30 mm Hg were treated using LE with intraocular lens implantation and 30 eyes with LPI. All subjects underwent Swept Source optical coherence tomography. We analyzed 35 parameters of each eye including the lens vault, the choroidal thickness, the anterior chamber angle, and iris specifications such as iris curvature. Considering the correlations between them, the machine learning method DD-SIMCA 1-class classification was applied: the proximity of each sample to the target class (control) was characterized by the total distance to it. RESULTS: After LE, IOP was significantly lower than after LPI ( P =0). Every third eye with PAC after LE reached the target class: specificity according to DD-SIMCA equals 0.67. This was not observed for the eyes after LPI: specificity equals 1.0. After LE, all parameters of the anterior chamber angle did not differ from the control (all P >0.05). After LPI, there was an increase in anterior chamber depth ( P =0) and a decrease in lens vault ( P =0), but results comparable to the control were achieved only for iris curvature ( P =1.000). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of LE in PAC is higher than LPI due to the better postoperative anterior chamber topography and lower IOP. This study lends further clinical and anatomic support to the emerging notion of LE as an effective treatment for PAC.